Ukraine at a Crossroads: Zelenskyy Rejects U.S. 28-Point Peace Plan, Warns of ‘Impossible Choice’
Kyiv / Kampala
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has issued a stark warning amid intense U.S. pressure: his country faces a potentially “impossible choice” — either accept a 28-point peace proposal that demands major concessions, or risk losing vital U.S. support.
Announced recently by the U.S., the plan reportedly includes ceding additional Ukrainian territory, reducing the size of its military, and forgoing NATO membership.
Zelenskyy said in a public address that while he is “working to make the path forward dignified and truly effective for achieving lasting peace,” he would not betray Ukraine’s sovereignty or constitution.
He acknowledged that declining the deal risks jeopardising continued American intelligence, weapons, and logistical support — a risk he described as “one of the heaviest” his country has ever faced.

Why It Matters
- Sovereignty vs. Survival
The proposed terms appear to require Ukraine to accept territorial and military concessions — a deeply sensitive issue for a nation defending its existence.
Zelenskyy’s argument frames the debate as not just strategic, but moral: does Ukraine preserve its dignity or give up too much for a fragile peace?
- U.S. Role & Leverage
The U.S. is reportedly using its military support as leverage, which could mark a significant turning point in how superpowers influence proxy conflicts.
If the U.S. were to seriously reduce support, Ukraine’s ability to defend itself could be severely compromised — potentially shifting the balance on the battlefield.
- European & NATO Dynamics
The plan, reportedly crafted without European input, has led to discontent among key allies.
European leaders are now under pressure: support Ukraine’s red lines, propose alternatives, or risk their relevance in any future peace settlement.
- Long-Term Implications
Accepting this deal may shape Ukraine’s security architecture for decades: limiting NATO membership, reducing military capacity, and potentially exposing Kyiv to future vulnerabilities.
Rejecting it also has risks: possible U.S. retaliation, reduced aid, or strategic isolation — all during a harsh winter when Russia continues attacks on energy infrastructure.
What to Watch
Negotiation Outcomes: Will Ukraine propose a counter-offer? Are there significant changes coming to the U.S. 28-point plan?
U.S. Leverage Moves: Will Washington follow through with implied threats (cutting intelligence, military aid) if Ukraine declines?
European Response: How will EU leaders — especially France, Germany, and the UK — respond to Ukraine’s resistance? Will they step in with alternative frameworks?
Domestic Impact in Ukraine: Will Zelenskyy’s rhetoric help unite Ukrainians around a hard line, or will dissent grow as pressure mounts?
Long-Term Security Guarantees: What kind of legally binding guarantees (if any) will Ukraine demand in return for making compromises? How enforceable will they be?

